Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 31, 1992No. 13-91-645-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NYE, Chief Justice.

A jury found appellant, Modesto Rodriguez, guilty of aggravated unlawful possession of a controlled substance. After finding the two enhancement allegations true, the jury assessed his punishment at ninety-five years in prison, plus a $50,000 fine. By a single point of error, appellant complains that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. We affirm.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution,1 Officer Turner, an investigator with the Victoria Coun*781ty Sheriffs Department, testified that about 4:00 p.m. on May 7,1991,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State PenitentiarySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Hardesty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
  2. Miller v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  3. Moss v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1994
  4. Alexander Nathaniel Brenes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
  5. Alton G. Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API