Legal Opinion

United States v. 111 East 88th Partners

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 27, 2020No. 1:16-cv-09446Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, ORDER - against - 16 Civ. 9446 (PGG) 111 EAST 88TH PARTNERS, Defendant. PAUL G. GARDEPHE, U.S.D.J.: Plaintiff United States of America alleges that Defendant 111 East 88th Partners violated the Fair Housing Act (the “FHA”) by (1) denying a reasonable accommodation to rent-controlled tenant Gregory Reich by prohibiting him from keeping an emotional support animal in his apartment, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(2), (3)(B); and (2) interfering with Reich’s exercise of his rights under the FHA…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API