McMillan v. Parkell
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Jasper Court of Common Pleas. Mechanic’s Bank vs. Wright, 53 Mo. 153; Foster vs. Wallace, 2 Mo. 231 ; and contended that the reasoning in the case of Picot vs. Signia.go, 22 Mo. 587, following the case of Spriggs vs. The Bank of Mount Pleasant, 10 Pet. 257, was founded upon a sealed instrument. Sprigg vs. Mt. Pleasant Bank, 10 Pet. 257 ; Id. 14 Pet. 201 ; Picot vs. Signiago, 22 Mo. 587. ’ -
1Opinion of the CourtHough, Judge
This was an action against the defendant founded upon the following instrument of writing:
$150. Carthage, Mo., December 18, 1873.
Six months after date we, each as principal, jointly and severally promise to pay to the order of Wm. McMillan, in Carthage, Mo., one hundred and fifty dollars for value received, with interest at the rate of ten per cent. per. annum from maturity. We do waive all exemption of homestead and other property from execution under the laws of this State ; nor shall any delay or extension of time of demand of payment affect our liability hereon, and we hereby agree to pay…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- President, Directors & Co. of Claremont Bank v. WoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 1838
- Picot v. SigniagoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
3Cited by9 opinions
- Beers v. WolfSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Myers v. ChesleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
- Reissaus v. WhitesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
- Reynolds v. SchadeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
- Wood v. MotleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.