Chicago Title Insurance v. Sherred Village Associates
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COFFIN, Circuit Judge.
The issue before us is whether federal law should adopt a state rule of decision governing the relative priority of a mechanics’ lien and a mortgage insured by and assigned to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). We have been charged by the Supreme Court with the responsibility of determining whether the facts of this case are sufficiently different from those in United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc., 440 U.S. 715, 99 S.Ct. 1448, 59 L.Ed.2d 711 (1979), to necessitate a federal rule of decision in priority disputes involving HUD mortgages. For the reasons…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Chicago Title Insurance Company v. Sherred Village Associates, Chicago Title Insurance Company v. Sherred Village Associates, Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Freedom Mortgage Corp. v. Las Vegas Development Group, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2015