Coulson v. Huntsman Packaging Products, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.
One who does not possess land owes no duty of care to prevent an unreasonable risk of harm arising from the condition of trees on the land near a public way. Here, appellant David Coulson failed to present sufficient evidence showing that respondents possessed a planting strip owned by the city of Kent. Consequently, the trial court did not err in concluding that respondents did not owe Coulson a duty of care as to the condition of a tree on the planting strip. We affirm.
FACTS
This case arises from an automobile accident in Kent, Washington. Coulson did not obey a stop sign at the intersection…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pedroza v. BryantWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Hutchins v. 1001 Fourth Avenue AssociatesWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Owen Orthmann v. Apple River Campground, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Alcaraz v. VeceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Husovsky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Coulson v. Huntsman Packaging Products Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Rebecca Fowler v. Brent SwiftCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019