Legal Opinion

United States v. Cecil Arnold Odom, A/K/A Bud Kelly

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 24, 1990No. 88-5687Published

1Opinion of the Court

895 F.2d 928

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Cecil Arnold ODOM, a/k/a Bud Kelly, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 88-5687.

United States Court of Appeals,

Fourth Circuit.

Jan. 24, 1990.

Luther Charles West, Baltimore, Md., for defendant-appellant.

Barbara Slaymaker Sale, Asst. U.S. Atty., Baltimore, Md. (Breckinridge L. Willcox, U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., on brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

Prior report: 4th Cir., 888 F.2d 1014.ON PETITION FOR REHEARING WITH SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING IN BANC

ORDER

The appellant's petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc were submitted to the…

Also in this document: Dissent · Murnaghan; Dissent · Murnaghan.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. United States v. Joseph A. Chase, United States of America v. Robert H. Parrish, United States of America v. Wyatt J. Roy, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  5. Mitchell v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API