Modern Order of Praetorians v. Bloom
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Choctaw County ; C. E. Dudley, Judge. Action by Emma Bloom against the Modern Order of Praetorians to recover on three certain .certificates of life insurance. Judgment for plaintiff, and'defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
POPE, C.
In the briefs and argument, distinguished by marked ability on both sides of the case, it is contended by the plaintiff in error that certain alleged false statements in the application for the insurance preclude a recovery. The de fendant in error, relying on the fact that the applications are merely referred to in the certificates and not attached thereto, insists that the applications cannot he admitted in evidence; the theory being that the Praetorians are writing old line and not fraternal insurance.
If the plaintiff is right in its insistence as to the character of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- McPherson v. BlackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Town of Enterprise v. State ex rel. Attorney-GeneralSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
- McConihe v. State, ex rel. McMurraySupreme Court of Florida · 1879
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- American Ins. Union v. LowryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
- Locomotive Engineers Mutual Life & Accident Ass'n v. VandergriffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Read, Ins. v. Midwest Mutual Burial Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Naill v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- National Benevolent Society v. RussellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.