Legal Opinion

Valenzuela v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 1, 2004No. CA CR 03-373Published

1Per curiam

Appellant, Jose Luis Valenzuela, was coniam. judgment was entered on August 27, 2002, when he was represented by attorney Ralph Blagg. His notice of appeal was filed on September 27, 2002 — one day late —• by Charles E. Waldman, a Tennessee attorney who is not authorized to practice law in Arkansas and who was not associated with Blagg. The trial court dismissed the appeal for failure to file a timely notice of appeal. Within thirty days after the dismissal order, Waldman filed another notice of appeal. When the record was tendered to the clerk, the clerk refused to accept it for filing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McKenzie v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Valenzuela v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API