Legal Opinion

Hotrum v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided March 10, 2006No. A-9020PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COATS, Chief Judge.

Darrin Hotrum was convicted of misconduct involving a controlled substance in the fourth degree, a class C felony, for possessing more than twenty-five marijuana plants. 1 Hotrum entered a no contest plea pursuant to Cooksey v. State, 2 preserving two issues for appeal. In his first issue, Hotrum claims that the police found the marijuana plants following an unlawful warrantless entry and search of his residence. We uphold Superior Court Judge Eric Smith’s ruling that the police entry and search of Hotrum’s residence was justified under the emergency aid exception to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Cooksey v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Ravin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Schraff v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Gallmeyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. DeneuiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. GibsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. American Civil Liberties UnionAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. American Civil Liberties UnionAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. DeneuiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API