Legal Opinion
Feagin v. Stokes
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided March 15, 2002No. 2001007PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Michael E. Feagin appeals to this court from a judgment dismissing his complaint. We reverse and remand.
On June 19, 2000, Feagin, who was incarcerated in the Pike County Jail on various charges against him in Pike and Coffee Counties alleged that he reached an agreement with Rickey Stokes, a bail bondsman, about posting bail for all of the charges in both counties totaling the amount of $34,600. Feagin claims that, although he did not have the cash to pay the 10% premium, Stokes agreed to accept his 1991 Ford Explorer Sport as collateral. Feagin claims that he and Stokes agreed that the bonds…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hubbard v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Veteto v. YocumCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
- Clements v. MoncriefSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- M.J.F. v. J.W.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
3Cited by8 opinions
- Arrington v. MathisCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
- Veteto v. SWANSON SERVICES CORP.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Brown v. BrownCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
- McConico v. CulliverCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- Thompson v. HuntleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.