Legal Opinion

Valencia v. Beaman

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1973No. 975PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from an adverse jury verdict and judgment based on a claim for damages against defendant, Dr. Beaman, a licensed ophthalmologist, for malpractice arising out of an operation to lift the right eyelid. We affirm.

Plaintiff raises two claims of error, (1) giving two instructions to the jury; and(2) refusing to permit contradictions and impeachment of Beaman’s custom and practice.(1) There was no Error in Giving Instructions.

The trial court gave the following instructions :(4). The contention of the plaintiff that there was a lack of care or failure to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jewell v. SeidenbergNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  2. City of Albuquerque v. AckermanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Brown v. General Insurance Company of AmericaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Nichols v. SefcikNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. George Washington University v. WaasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Harrison v. ICX, Illinois-California Express, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Sandoval v. CortezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Sandoval v. CortezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API