Langston v. Derwinski
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
1Opinion of the Court
*240ORDER
STEINBERG, Associate Judge.
The Court has considered: (1) appellant’s Notice of Appeal (NOA), which was filed on October 15, 1990, wherein he relates that he is seeking review of a Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) decision with a mailing date of June 8, 1990; and (2) appellant’s response, which was filed on February 4, 1991, to the Court’s order directing him to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed as untimely filed. Appellant stated that the NOA was mailed on October 9, 1990, and that it may have been received untimely because of intervening holidays.
To be timely filed under…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Skinner v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Elsevier v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
- Torres v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Patterson v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993