Legal Opinion

Stokes v. Stokes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 1, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action by William E. D. Stokes against Edward S. Stokes on four notes. After a dismissal of defendant’s counterclaim and a direction of a verdict for plaintiff (59 N. Y. Supp. 801), defendant moves for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.

On the 18th of October, 1892, the plaintiff brought an action in the superior court of the city of New York to recover upon three promissory notes made by the defendant to the order of the plaintiff. On the 21st of October, 1892, an amended complaint was served. ' Upon the same day another action was brought in the same court by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover the amount due upon a fourth promissory note. On the 16th of November, 1892, upon the consent of the attorneys for the respective parties, the said two actions were consolidated into one action. On the 22d of November,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stokes v. . StokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Stokes v. StokesNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Farrow v. State Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  2. In re Naylor's EstateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API