Lefrak Forest Hills Corp. v. Galvin
New York Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Jasen, J. (dissenting).
I would reverse the order of the Appellate Division and reinstate the determination of the Board of Standards and Appeals. Viewing the record as a whole, I believe that the board’s determination is supported by substantial evidence and is not otherwise arbitrary or capricious. Further, I do not believe that Lefrak’s privilege under the building permit matured into a vested right to complete construction of the projected high-rise apartment complex. Indeed, I question the applicability of the traditional vested rights doctrine to this case. Finally, assuming, as the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Buffalo v. . ChadeayneNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Dubow v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- People Ex Rel. Ortenberg v. BalesNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- People ex rel. Ortenberg v. BalesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- People Ex Rel. Manhattan Savings Institution v. OtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.