Legal Opinion
IN Bell Tele Co v. McCarty, William D.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 5, 2004No. 03-1123, 03-1122, 03-1124PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
This appeal stems from the interconnection agreement established between Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Incorporated d/b/a Ameritech Indiana (“Ameri-tech”) and AT & T Communications of Indiana, GP and TCG Indianapolis (collectively “AT & T”), pursuant to the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“Act”). 1 Because the parties could not reach a consensus regarding the content of the agreement, they submitted it to arbitration before the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (“IURC”). 47 U.S.C. § 252(b) (2001). The IURC hammered out the differences and ordered that the agreement…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- At&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States Telecom Association v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Incorporated v. William D. MccartyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004