Legal Opinion

Sookhoo v. Becton Dickinson & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 28, 2004No. 03-3216UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

This is an appeal of a summary judgment order. The relevant facts are set out in the District Court’s opinion. We find that there exists a genuine issue of material fact, and we therefore reverse the District Court’s summary judgement order and remand for trial.

In its complaint, Sookhoo alleged that he had a contract with Becton Dickinson and Company (“BD”) to be BD’s exclusive distributor in Trinidad. 1 Unfortunately for Sookhoo, he was unable to produce a written copy of any contract. In response to the complaint, BD submitted a motion to dismiss under FRCP 12(b)(6),…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rose v. BartleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  2. Norma J. Nesbit v. Gears Unlimited, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  3. Crown Central Petroleum Corporation v. Waldman, Carl J.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  4. Hancock Industries v. SchaefferCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Appriva Shareholder Litigation Co. v. Ev3, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  2. M.T. v. UNIONTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICTDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API