Legal Opinion

Julian v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 2005No. TC 4594; SC S51618; TC 4595; SC S51619PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

The issue in this tax case is whether Oregon Food Bank (OFB) qualifies as a “motor private carrier” under 49 USC section 13102(13) when it transfers food to members of a food-distribution network. If it does, then taxpayer, a driver for OFB who lives in Washington, is exempt from Oregon income tax. If not, then taxpayer must pay Oregon income taxes. The Oregon Tax Court decided that OFB does not qualify as a motor private carrier. Julian v. Dept. of Rev., 17 OTR 384 (2004). Taxpayer appealed. We agree with taxpayer and reverse.

We take the statement of facts from the decision of the Tax Court:

“…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. California State Board of Equalization v. Sierra Summit, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Iowa v. McFarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Shaw Ex Rel. Zollner v. PACC Health Plan, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Julian v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2004

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Etter v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Ann Sacks Tile Stone v. Dept. of Revenue, Tc 4879 (or.tax 11-29-2011)Oregon Tax Court · 2011
  3. Equity Advisors, Inc. v. Zylstra Harley-Davidson of Illinois, Inc. Zylstra, LLC and Zylstra Cycle Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2020
  4. Rice v. Diversified Specialty Pharmacy, LLCMassachusetts Superior Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API