Legal Opinion

M.W. Ettinger, Inc. v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 8, 1985No. C5-84-1539Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.

This appeal from an order sustaining a prejudgment garnishment challenges the constitutionality of the Minnesota garnishment statute, Minn.Stat. ch. 571. Further, it challenges the manner in which the funds were garnished. We affirm.

FACTS

The appellant is Thomas L. Anderson, individually and d/b/a B.A.T. Leasing. B.A.T., a Wisconsin truck leasing firm, is apparently a sole proprietorship owned by Anderson’s wife Barbara. The respondent, M.W. Ettinger, Inc., is a St. Paul trucking company. Edson Express, Inc., a Colorado company doing business in St. Paul, is the garnishee.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. International State Bank v. GamerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Olson v. IscheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API