State v. Newell
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from St. Louis Court of-Criminal Correction. Hon. David Murphy, Judge. (1) The facts show a “sale’7 at Kansas City, Kansas, and not in the city of St. Louis. Also that the “sale” was made by Swift & Company, and not by the defendant. The case of State v. Wingfield, 115 Mo. 428, settles the point that in the circumstances the sale is not made in the city of St. Louis. It would make no difference if Newell had been the agent of Swift & Company, which he was not.
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis Court of-Criminal Correction. Hon. David Murphy, Judge. (1) The facts show a “sale’7 at Kansas City, Kansas, and not in the city of St. Louis. Also that the “sale” was made by Swift & Company, and not by the defendant. The case of State v. Wingfield, 115 Mo. 428, settles the point that in the circumstances the sale is not made in the city of St. Louis. It would make no difference if Newell had been the agent of Swift & Company, which he was not. The rule is stated in That case as follows: „ “When the goods have been delivered to a common carrier for transportation to the…
1Opinion of the CourtGantt, P. J.
This is a prosecution instituted against the defendant in the St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction for a violation of the act entitled “An act prohibiting the coloring yellow of any substance designed to be used as a substitute for butter; to prohibit the manufacture, sale, keeping for sale and fraudulent use of substances designed as imitation butter; to regulate the manufacture, sale and keeping for sale of any substance designed to be used as a substitute for butter, and making an appropriation for carrying out the provisions of this act.” Approved April 19, 1895. Laws of Mo. 1895, p. 26.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. BockstruckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- State v. WingfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
3Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. Rodes v. WarnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- State v. MaurerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
- Town of Canton v. McDanielSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- Town of Kirkwood v. Meramec Highlands Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- State v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.