Legal Opinion

Melton v. Hicks

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 22, 1910No. 2200PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Buie; from city court of Oglethorpe — Judge Strozier presiding. September 14, 1909.

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, O. J.

1. It is expressly ruled by this court in Brantley Co. v. Southerland, 1 Ga. App. 804 (57 S. E. 960), that a traverse of the answer of the sheriff in response to a rule for alleged breach of duty can be filed, in the absence of laches, at any times before the case is called for trial. The facts in this case exonerate the plaintiff from any laches in filing his traverse to the sheriff’s answer to the rule.

2. This court knows of no law requiring the plaintiff to swear to his traverse of the answer of a sheriff ruled for breach of duty. Even if required to do so, the failure would be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brantley Co. v. SoutherlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Garrett v. Coweta Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Hendricks v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API