McIntosh v. Sylvania Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Woodside, J.,
The only issue in this workmen’s compensation case is the extent of the claimant’s disability. This is a question of fact for the Workmen’s Compensation Board. It accepted the referee’s finding that the claimant suffered a 15% disability and allowed |6.50 per week compensation. The claimant, arguing that he was totally disabled, appealed to the court below which affirmed the board.
Upon appeal to this Court, the claimant contends that all the credible evidence supports his position, and that the board was guilty of a capricious disregard of the competent evidence by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Curran v. Walter E. Knipe & Sons, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Rozauski v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Chuplis v. Steve Shalamanda Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Zbieg v. Rochester & Pittsburgh Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Baughman v. Hockensmith Wheel & Mine Car Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
3Cited by4 opinions
- Banas v. Eagle Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Finch v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Shiery v. Lauffer Tire Service, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Woods v. Murraysville Telephone Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Westmoreland County1961