Legal Opinion

Hauf v. Johnston

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 19, 2001No. 19379-9-IIIPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKato, J.

Does the sellers’ acceptance of a quitclaim deed from the purchasers, in lieu of foreclosure, extinguish a judgment lien that was obtained by a creditor of the purchasers? The superior court held that it did, based upon its finding that the quitclaim deed amounted to an abandonment of the purchasers’ interest in the property before the creditor levied upon it. The court therefore dismissed the judgment creditor’s action to foreclose his lien. We reverse because the facts do not support a finding of abandonment, but rather support a finding that the purchasers and sellers entered an agreed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kendrick v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Eckley v. Bonded Adjustment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Davis v. Rede Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  4. Schoneman v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hauf v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API