Pangborn Corp. v. Blatt
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County
Rule for new trial. C. P. Berks Co., Sept. T., 1920, No. 88.
1Opinion of the Court
WAGNER, J.,
Plaintiff’s suit against the defendant is for the recovery of the sum of $834. It averred in its statement that on Nov. 7,1919, the defendant had ordered from it by a written order (Exhibit A) an Inger-soll-Rand Air Compressor, agreeing to pay therefor the sum of $814.50, f. o. b. Easton. That in response to the order the company shipped the air compressor to the defendant; that the defendant had received it and installed it in proper working condition, and that upon demand defendant refused payment.
Among the defences in defendant’s affidavit of defence, paragraph 7, he averred…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ruth-Hastings Glass Tube Co. v. SlatterySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Meyers v. Somerset Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Work v. AdamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Kavalkovich v. Order of LibertySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Delaware County Trust Co. v. LongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.