Harper v. Evans

Appellant ardently argues and articulates that he is a pauper. *304While conceding that he does have a job in the prison, he claims that the only payment for his labor is “one bar of soap, one razor, three sheets of paper, three envelopes, and one roll of tissue paper.” He further argues that “[w]hen judgment is separated from love, ‘The Human Cry for Justice will Appear for sure.’ ”

Decided October 4, 1985. Earnest Harper, pro se. Dupont K. Cheney, District Attorney, for appellees.

“In the ornithology of litigation this case is a tomtit, furnished with a garb of feathers ample enough for a turkey.…