Legal Opinion

Rose v. Curtis

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided July 8, 1941Published

1Opinion of the CourtKeniston, J.

This is an action of contract on an account annexed for legal services rendered by the plaintiff for the defendant. The defendant’s answer is a general denial and a special answer that the plaintiff’s services arose out of proceedings before the Industrial Accident Board and that this court has no jurisdiction to entertain the cause.

At the trial the evidence went in on an agreed oral statement of facts of which the following are all that are material :

*360“The plaintiff, a practicing attorney, was engaged by the defendant to represent his claim in connection with an accident that had occurred,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frati v. JanniniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. G. E. Lothrop Theatres Co. v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Gritta's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. Silva's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API