Legal Opinion

Black v. Powell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1929No. Docket No. 126, Calendar No. 34,448PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

Plaintiffs are milk dealers in Saginaw county, and filed the hill herein to restrain defendants from enforcing Act No. 361, Pub. Acts 1927. The bill was dismissed in the circuit court, and plaintiffs appealed.

Since the hearing in the circuit the mentioned act has been amended by Act No. 60, Pub. Acts 1929, and this has eliminated several questions, and leaves only the following contentions: (1) The act expresses more than one object. (2) The object of the act is not expressed in the title. (3) The act “attempts to revise, alter or amend a law by reference to its title only without re-enacting…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Old Tavern Farm, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1935
  2. Sambor v. Home Owners' Loan Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. People v. AndreaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API