Legal Opinion
Jansen v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 13, 1992PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiff was injured while working on a construction site in North Carolina and sued his employer’s workers’ compensátion and liability insurance carrier, defendant Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York. The Appellate Division granted summary judgment to defendant, holding that liability could not be imposed on the carrier in an action by an employee of the insured for injuries sustained in the course of employment where the alleged negligence "arises out of the regular safety inspections of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Home Mutual Insurance v. Broadway Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Gerace v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1966
- James v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- MATTER OF JAMES v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Laborers Local 17 Health & Benefit Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- New Jersey Carpenters Health Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. DeshazoSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Kobre v. United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- City of Amsterdam v. LamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.