Legal Opinion

Long Island Neurological Assocs., P.C. v. Highmark Blue Shield & Reed Smith LLP

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 20, 2019No. 2:18-cv-81 (DRH)(AYS)Published

1Opinion of the Court

HURLEY, Senior District Judge:

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Long Island Neurological Associates, P.C. ("Plaintiff") brought this action against Defendants Highmark Blue Shield ("Highmark") and Reed Smith LLP ("Reed Smith," collectively "Defendants") for under-reimbursement for surgical services pursuant to the Employment Retirement Income Security Act. (Am. Compl. ¶¶ 1, 8.)

Presently before the Court is Defendants motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. ("Rule") 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(b)(6).

BACKGROUND

The following relevant facts come from the Amended Complaint ("Am. Compl.") and are assumed true…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Natalia Makarova v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  2. Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  3. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. SchoonejongenSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Am. Orthopedic & Sports Med. v. Independence Blue Cross Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  5. McCulloch Orthopaedic Surgical Services, PLLC v. Aetna Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API