Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Mingo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 8, 2008Published

1Dissent

Spolzino, J.P. (dissenting).

I do not agree that the range of materials that may be considered by a SORA court is broad enough to encompass the documents upon which the SORA determination at issue here depends. Because I believe, moreover, that the defendant adequately preserved for appellate review his objections to the admissibility and sufficiency of that evidence, I would vacate the determination and remit the matter for a new hearing. I, therefore, dissent, respectfully.

As the majority notes, the classification of the defendant as a level two sex offender turns on whether he was properly…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. People v. SettlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. United States v. Wayne Gaskin, AKA "Atiba," and Al CastleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  5. People v. Calbud, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API