People v. Mingo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Spolzino, J.P. (dissenting).
I do not agree that the range of materials that may be considered by a SORA court is broad enough to encompass the documents upon which the SORA determination at issue here depends. Because I believe, moreover, that the defendant adequately preserved for appellate review his objections to the admissibility and sufficiency of that evidence, I would vacate the determination and remit the matter for a new hearing. I, therefore, dissent, respectfully.
As the majority notes, the classification of the defendant as a level two sex offender turns on whether he was properly…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- People v. SettlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- United States v. Wayne Gaskin, AKA "Atiba," and Al CastleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- People v. Calbud, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.