Legal Opinion
Glacier Fish Company v. Penny Pritzker
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 10, 2016No. 15-35103PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Partial Concurrence by Judge WATSON
OPINION
IKUTA, Circuit Judge:
Glacier Fish Co. challenges the fee imposed on it by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) pursuant to the agency’s cost recovery program developed under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Mag-nuson-Stevens Act, or MSA). We conclude that the agency had the authority to require Glacier to pay a cost recovery fee but that the .agency’s calculation of the amount of the 2014 cost recovery fee was inconsistent with its own regulations. We therefore reverse the district court’s grant of summary judgment…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Chase Bank USA, N. A. v. McCoySupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- National Parks & Conservation Ass'n v. Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Pacific Choice Seafood Company v. Wilbur RossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Douglas Clark v. Jeffrey BeardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Fishing Rights Alliance, Inc. v. PritzkerDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2017
- Hemp Industries Association v. UsdeaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.