Legal Opinion

Browder, Manget & Co. v. Blake & Madden

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 13, 1910PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Money rule. Before Judge Freeman. Meriwether superior court. June 22, 1909.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, J.

1. A firm bought certain mules, and gave to the vendors a purchase-money note in which it was provided that the title should remain in the latter until payment. This was duly attested and recorded. Later common-law judgments were obtained against the purchasers, and the executions issued on them were levied on the mules. None of the purchase-money had been paid. The vendors attempted to foreclose their note by affidavit, as in case of a chattel mortgage or bill of sale given as a security for a debt not exceeding $100 (Civil Code, § 2753; Acts: 1899, p. 82), and placed the execution issued…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Green & Colwell v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Berry v. Robinson & OvertonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Rich v. ColquittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  4. Winter v. GarrardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thrash & Co. v. HarmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. First National Bank v. Burruss & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  3. Hinton v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  4. Coweta Fertilizer Co. v. Kiser Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  5. Lathem v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API