Browder, Manget & Co. v. Blake & Madden
Supreme Court of Georgia
Money rule. Before Judge Freeman. Meriwether superior court. June 22, 1909.
1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, J.
1. A firm bought certain mules, and gave to the vendors a purchase-money note in which it was provided that the title should remain in the latter until payment. This was duly attested and recorded. Later common-law judgments were obtained against the purchasers, and the executions issued on them were levied on the mules. None of the purchase-money had been paid. The vendors attempted to foreclose their note by affidavit, as in case of a chattel mortgage or bill of sale given as a security for a debt not exceeding $100 (Civil Code, § 2753; Acts: 1899, p. 82), and placed the execution issued…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Green & Colwell v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Berry v. Robinson & OvertonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Rich v. ColquittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
- Winter v. GarrardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thrash & Co. v. HarmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- First National Bank v. Burruss & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Hinton v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Coweta Fertilizer Co. v. Kiser Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Lathem v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.