Legal Opinion
Henderson v. Target Stores
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided March 29, 2006No. CIVA06CV00465PSFMEHPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER OF REMAND
FIGA, District Judge.
On March 17, 2006 this Court issued an order to show cause (Dkt.# 5) why this case should not be remanded to state court. Defendant Target filed its response on March 27, 2006 (Dkt.# 6). The matter is ripe for decision.
This action was removed from El Paso County, Colorado District Court on March 15, 2006 on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(a), 1441(a) and (b). The underlying complaint, filed in state court in September 2005, asserts a negligence claim based on the plaintiff tripping over a box in an aisle at a Target store…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Marshall Huffman Virginia Newton v. Saul Holdings Limited Partnership, a Maryland Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Addo v. Globe Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Hall v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2004
3Cited by5 opinions
- Paros Properties LLC v. Colorado Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Baker v. Sears Holdings Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 2007
- Harding v. Sentinel Ins. Co., Ltd.District Court, D. Colorado · 2007
- Carney v. Anthem Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020
- Holladay v. Kone, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2009