Legal Opinion

Snohomish County v. Hayward

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1895No. 1586PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Snohomish County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Snohomish county rendered in an action brought for the collection of taxes under the revenue law of 1893, and involves the constitutionality of ch. 2, title 21, of the General Statutes, which is a chapter in relation to public dikes and dams. Section A 929 provides that when five or more owners of lands adjoining and contiguous, subject to overflow from tide water or river freshet, shall petition the board of county commissioners of the county in which such lands are situate, setting…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Askam v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Skagit County v. StilesWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Peterson v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Weber v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kincaid v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Wong Kee Jun v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Bowes v. City of AberdeenWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. State Ex Rel. Eastvold v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Seanor v. Board of County CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1895

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API