Farrar v. Arthur

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in a contract and negligence action. We reverse.

It is alleged and there is evidence to support the fact that Arthur was hired to design and, to a limited extent, supervise the construction of a building for Dr. Far-rar. Dr. Farrar and his expert witness testified by affidavit and deposition that the building was not constructed in accordance with the plans and that defects caused leaks and gave rise to other claims for damages. Dr. Farrar says that if architect Arthur had correctly supervised construction of the building then it would…