Legal Opinion

DeMuth v. Head

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 6, 1964No. 16315Published

1Opinion

ON REHEARING

In his motion for rehearing appellant asserts that regardless of whether appellee is individually liable on the note in question appellant has a cause of action against ap-pellee under his allegation that he is entitled to an implied vendor’s lien on property conveyed by appellant to appellee. In his petition appellant alleges that the note endorsed by Rags to Riches, Inc. was delivered by appellee to appellant as part of the purchase price of certain described real property conveyed by appellant to appellee.

Appellant’s contention is without ’merit. The fact that appellant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Strain v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  2. Westmoreland v. MastersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API