Kazue Swedberg v. Emil Marotzke
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHN R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Emil Marotzke appeals from an order reinstating Kazue Swedberg’s dismissal of her complaint without prejudice. Mar-otzke contends his motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) was converted to a summary judgment motion because Swedberg filed extraneous materials with her opposition. Because Rule 41(a)(1) only permits dismissal without prejudice before a defendant has filed a summary judgment motion, Marotzke contends that Swedberg’s notice of dismissal was not effective. The district court’s 1 ultimate conclusion correctly…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL, a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- David W. Jackson v. Southern California Gas Company Claudia Dodson Lois Durfee Mary Moore Jean Bish Betty Shattery Pat ShatteryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, L.L.C. v. Gray Davis, Governor of the State of California, and California Power Exchange CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Timothy S. Hamilton v. Shearson-Lehman American Express, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Van Ridgeway, Charles Hilton, and Robert ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Joann Aamot v. Robert L. KasselCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- PTA-FLA, Inc. v. ZTE USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Young v. City of VisaliaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
- Fraley v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Mount Hope Church v. Bash Back!Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Williams v. County of AlamedaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.