Legal Opinion
Doughnut MacH. Corporation v. Bibbey
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 5, 1933No. 2808PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal, with excessively numerous assignments of error, from a judgment in a personal injury ease, against a New York corporation by a citizen of Massachusetts. The ease has been tried twice, each time with a verdict for the plaintiff. The first verdict was set aside because the damages were excessive. The second (alternative) verdict in October, 1931, was for $3,-000. The plaintiff moved to set this aside because of inadequate damages; and the de--f endant, because it was against the law. In a careful memorandum dated April 22, 1932, the court overruled…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Hart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Twin City Pipe Line Co. v. Harding Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Santa Fe, Prescott & Phœnix Railway Co. v. Grant Bros. Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Basin Oil Co. v. Baash-Ross Tool Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Sinclair Prairie Oil Co. v. ThornleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Fire Association of Phila. v. Allis Chalmers Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1955
- Cabrera v. DovalSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.