Legal Opinion

Peter Polanco v. Commissioner of Internal Reven

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 22, 2017No. 17-1649Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION *

2Per curiam

Peter Polanco, proceeding pro se, appeals an order of the United States Tax Court determining a tax deficiency and penalty owed to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). For the reasons that follow, we will affirm the judgment of the Tax Court.

Polanco filed a joint federal income tax return for the tax year 2013. It is undisputed that Polanco did not report income he received in the amount of $149,062. On June 22, 2015, the IRS issued a notice of deficiency to Polanco and his wife. The notice set forth a deficiency of $28,864 and a penalty of $5,103. Polanco filed a petition…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walter Anderson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  2. Mark Sunik and Tamara Sunik v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  3. Duquesne Light Holdings Inc v. Commissioner of Internal RevenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API