Legal Opinion

Guelda v. Hays & Nicoulin, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 7, 1954PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMBS, Justice.

The question is whether the attractive nuisance doctrine is applicable to the facts of this case.

Charles Guelda, Jr., a 12-year-o'ld boy, slipped and broke his leg on the muddy basement floor of a building under construction by the appellee. Charles was attending a church picnic being held on the grounds of St. Matthias Church in Louisville. The appellee was engaged, under contract with the St. Matthias 'Church, in the construction of a school building on the premises. The picnic area was adjacent to the partially completed building. After the picnic supper, Charles decided to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Goss v. Shawnee Post No. 3204, V. F. W. of United States, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954
  2. Bates v. CaudillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fourseam Coal Corp. v. Greer Ex Rel. GreerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
  2. Goben Ex Rel. Goben v. Sidney Winer Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  3. Goben Ex Rel. Goben v. Sidney Winer Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API