Legal Opinion

Pierson v. Laut

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 26, 2003No. ED 81622PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GLENN A. NORTON, Presiding Judge.

Mary Ann Laut appeals the judgment denying her petition for a declaration of a resulting trust. We dismiss the appeal.

I. BACKGROUND

The judgment contains the following findings of fact. Laut and Steven Pierson lived together for several years, but were never married. The first house they lived in was originally titled in Pierson’s name and subsequently held in both parties’ names for a period of time. Laut then quitclaimed her interest in the first house to Pierson, and he purchased another residence in his name only. The parties lived together at this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bishop v. Heartland Chevrolet, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Lewis v. Allstate Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Fansher v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. B.N.A. (Formerly B.N.R.) v. Douglas B. ReadyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Timothy G. Vogel v. Robert S. SteffenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API