Legal Opinion

Kopp Clay Co. v. State Ex Rel. Fulton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1932No. 23323PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

It is in brief the claim of the plaintiff in error that since the Byesville State Bank knew that the $2,800 was deposited to meet the pay roll of the Ohio Building Tile Company, a trust arose by implication, and that hence the Kopp Clay Company can recover the amount of the entire sum deposited by the Ohio Building Tile Company in the Byesville State Bank. The sum deposited in the Byesville State Bank, namely, $2,791.94, was substantially identical with the loan made by the Kopp Clay Company to the Ohio Building Tile Company. Furthermore, the record presents ample evidence tending to show…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dolph v. CrossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  2. Union Trust & Savings Bank v. Southern Traction Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1921
  3. American Surety Co. v. Bank of DawsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Federal Insurance Company v. The Fifth Third BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  2. Excel Ass'n Management v. Huntington National Bank, N.A. (In Re Team America, Inc.)District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API