Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Belknap

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 5, 1923No. 10,213PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Allen

This is an action to recover damages for alleged negligence. The defendants are the members of the board of county commissioners of Fremont County, and they are sued as individuals. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the amended complaint. The plaintiff elected to stand on the amended complaint, and judgment was entered for defendants. The plaintiff brings the cause here for review.

From the amended complaint it appears that the plaintiff was injured, and his wife was fatally injured, as the result of an accident which occurred upon a public highway. They were passengers in an automobile…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Snethen v. Harrison CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  2. Wood v. Boone CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  3. Packard v. VoltzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  4. Worden v. WittIdaho Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. BishSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Trimble v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. Leake v. CainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. Evans v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. MorelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. Quintano v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API