Legal Opinion

Lemos v. Eichel

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 24, 1978No. Docket Nos. 3056, 3057, 3068PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN (G. A.), P. J.

These three actions consist of a personal injury action and two wrongful death actions, all arising out of the same accident. The three matters were consolidated for the purpose of trial. The principal issues on this appeal arise by reason of comparative fault and partial indemnity guidelines enunciated in the seminal cases of Li v. Yellow Cab Co. (1975) 13 Cal.3d 804 [119 Cal.Rptr. 858, 532 P.2d 1226, 78 A.L.R.3d 393] and American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior Court (1978) 20 Cal.3d 578 [146 Cal.Rptr. 182, 578 P.2d 899]. The cases were tried in the post-Li…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  2. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Nest-KartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Buckley v. ChadwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Hyatt v. Sierra Boat Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Aceves v. Regal Pale Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Goulet v. Whitin MacHine Works, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  3. Sagadin v. RipperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Scott v. Cascade StructuresWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. McBride v. CHEVRON USAMississippi Supreme Court · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API