Legal Opinion

State v. Gourley

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1956Published

1Opinion

ON REHEARING

*384Geddes, Felker, Walton & Richmond, of Roseburg, for the petition.

On Respondents Petition foe Reheaeing

BRAND, J.

The defendants Gourley petition for a rehearing upon the ground that the “Amended Complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against these petitioning Respondents in that it affirmatively alleges that the Respondent, Empire Mill-work Corporation, was the owner, operator or person in possession of the lands upon which the fire is alleged to have started and burned.” The contention *385appears to "be that there is no allegation that the defendants…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Murray v. LambOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Holmberg v. Prudential Savings & Loan Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Skinner v. FurnasOregon Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API