Hunt v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Held, on the evidence, that the dividend received by the petitioner was a cash dividend and not a stock dividend.
1Opinion of the Court
APPEAL OF W. J. HUNT.
Hunt v. Commissioner
Docket No. 5791.
United States Board of Tax Appeals
5 B.T.A. 356; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2895;
October 30, 1926, Decided
Held, on the evidence, that the dividend received by the petitioner was a cash dividend and not a stock dividend.
A. Lee Rawlings, C.P.A., for the petitioner.
Thomas P. Dudley, Jr., Esq., for the Commissioner.
TRAMMELL
This is an appeal from the determination of a deficiency in income tax for 1918 in the amount of $2,219.62. The deficiency arises from the action of the Commissioner in increasing the income reported by the petitioner on account of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hunt v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926