Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided October 30, 1926No. Docket No. 5791Published

Held, on the evidence, that the dividend received by the petitioner was a cash dividend and not a stock dividend.

1Opinion of the Court

APPEAL OF W. J. HUNT.

Hunt v. Commissioner

Docket No. 5791.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

5 B.T.A. 356; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2895;

October 30, 1926, Decided

Held, on the evidence, that the dividend received by the petitioner was a cash dividend and not a stock dividend.

A. Lee Rawlings, C.P.A., for the petitioner.

Thomas P. Dudley, Jr., Esq., for the Commissioner.

TRAMMELL

This is an appeal from the determination of a deficiency in income tax for 1918 in the amount of $2,219.62. The deficiency arises from the action of the Commissioner in increasing the income reported by the petitioner on account of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hunt v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API