Legal Opinion
In Re: Szanto
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 15, 2023No. 3:22-cv-01064Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Peter Szanto, Case No.: 22cv1064-JO-BGS 12 Debtor-Appellant, ORDER DENYING SZANTO’S 13 v. MOTION TO REOPEN CASE AND VACATE ORDER 14 Chase Bank, 15 Creditor-Appellee. 16 17 18 Debtor-Appellant Peter Szanto requested to reopen this case and vacate the Court’s 19 previous order denying a stay of foreclosure proceedings. Dkt. 19. For the following 20 reasons, the Court denies the motion. 21 Szanto pursued various measures to stall the impending foreclosure of the property 22 located at 11 Shore Pine Drive,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Foster v. CarsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Pantoja v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2009
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. Union & Planters' Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
- Ellis v. EmeryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004