Legal Opinion

Anglin v. Kilbourne

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 13, 1912No. 19,366PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Twenty-Fourth Judicial District Court, Parish of East Feliciana; George J. Woodside, Judge. Action by J. N. Anglin against James and Charles Kilbourne. On opposition of the Bank of West Feliciana. From a judgment for plaintiff, the opposing defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtProyostx, J.

The defendants, James and Charles Kilbourne, owners in indivisión with their seven brothers and sisters, in the proportion of one-ninth to each,'of four separate pieces of real estate inherited from their father and mother, mortgaged their interest to the plaintiff. The act of mortgage contained the following clause:

“When the above-described property shall be partitioned between these mortgagors and their coheirs, this mortgage shall attach to that portion of above-described real estate as shall fall to the share of these mortgagors, the same not to be less in value than the above-described…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Louisiana v. Atlas Pipeline Corp.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1940
  2. Remington-Rand, Inc. v. Profits Island Gravel Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Hoover v. PenningtonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API