Legal Opinion
Randle v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided September 30, 2004No. 3:03-cv-00746PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BARBOUR, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand. Having considered the Motion, Response, attachments to each, and supporting and opposing authority, the Court finds that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand is not well taken and should be denied.
I. Background and Procedural History
The issue and sub-issues of this case arise out of a personal injury action for uses of the recalled drug, Lotronex® (“Lo-tronex”). All that is necessary for an understanding of this Opinion and Order is a brief recitation of pertinent facts. 1
In their Complaint, Plaintiffs named…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Kelli Smallwood v. Illinois Central Railroad Company Mississippi Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Barbara Allen v. R & H Oil & Gas Company, Farrar Oilfield Service and Equipment Co., and Tri-State Oil Services, Inc., Tri-State Oil Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- De Aguilar v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bourne v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2008
- Cantor v. WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, FSBDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2009
- Rodriguez Ex Rel. Sifuentes v. Casa Chapa S.A., De C.V.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2005
- Jones v. Hartford Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2004
- Gaddis v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.