Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Wright

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1964No. Appeal, 203PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

Walter L. Wright, the appellant-defendant, after trial by jury, was convicted of murder in the first degree. Punishment was fixed at life imprisonment. The lower court denied a new trial and imposed sentence in accordance with the verdict. This appeal followed.

The evidence overwhelmingly established the defendant’s guilt, but trial errors require that a new trial be granted.

The factual background in brief detail is as follows:

Wright and one Daniel Clemons conspired to burglarize the Reno Cafe in the city of Philadelphia, where Wright had formerly been employed as a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. United States v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PadgettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Commonwealth v. AmosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Commonwealth v. ReginelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. People v. MarshMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Commonwealth v. BurkettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API