Commonwealth v. Wright
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Eagen,
Walter L. Wright, the appellant-defendant, after trial by jury, was convicted of murder in the first degree. Punishment was fixed at life imprisonment. The lower court denied a new trial and imposed sentence in accordance with the verdict. This appeal followed.
The evidence overwhelmingly established the defendant’s guilt, but trial errors require that a new trial be granted.
The factual background in brief detail is as follows:
Wright and one Daniel Clemons conspired to burglarize the Reno Cafe in the city of Philadelphia, where Wright had formerly been employed as a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PadgettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Commonwealth v. AmosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. ReginelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- People v. MarshMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Commonwealth v. BurkettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.