Legal Opinion

Bliven v. Brunswick Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 27, 1982No. WD 32250Published

1Opinion of the Court

MANFORD, Judge.

Defendant appeals from an adverse judgment arising from a claim for damages pursuant to § 290.140 RSMo 1978. The judgment is reversed.

While numerous errors are charged, due to disposition of this appeal, only one alleged error is considered. In summary, it is alleged the trial court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for judgment N.O.V. because respondent failed to make a submissa-ble case.

The record reveals the following pertinent facts. Respondent (employee — plain*611tiff at trial) commenced employment with appellant (employer — defendant at trial) on December 30, 1974. He…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Labrier v. Anheuser Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  2. Potter v. Milbank Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  3. Newman Ex Rel. Newman v. Greater Kansas City Baptist & Community Hospital Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Bennett v. North Brighton Townhouses, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Bliven v. Brunswick Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API